The evolution of kissing: How primate grooming shaped human affection

In romantic movies, kissing often symbolizes love, yet this simple act of pressing lips together has peculiar origins. Surprisingly, human kissing may have evolved from behaviors seen in other primates, particularly grooming habits.

Evolutionary psychologist Adriano Lameira of the University of Warwick suggests that kissing began as a vestigial behavior for grooming. The idea, detailed in Evolutionary Anthropology, theorizes that ancient grooming behaviors, once used to remove debris from a partner's fur, transformed over time into kissing. This hypothesis, the “groomer’s final kiss,” offers a new perspective on how a functional act of grooming might have evolved into a social gesture with emotional weight.

In primate groups, social bonding through grooming is a common practice. “Grooming consists of picking through the fur of others to remove parasites, dead skin, and debris,” Lameira explains. This behavior does more than promote cleanliness; it fosters alliances, reduces stress, and releases endorphins, helping cement social bonds.

In fact, for many primates, grooming is central to maintaining group cohesion. However, unlike fur-covered primates, humans lost their fur over millennia, reducing the need for extensive grooming. Consequently, we now spend around 89% less time grooming one another than expected for primates. Yet Lameira suggests that the “groomer’s final kiss” may have persisted even after the practical need for grooming faded, evolving into a social symbol now recognized as a kiss.

To understand why kissing takes on this form, Lameira explains that in great apes, a grooming session might end with the groomer closing in, pressing their lips against their partner’s skin to remove a stubborn parasite or debris. This light lip contact may have once held an important function, but as grooming became less necessary, the act persisted as a brief symbolic gesture.

“Over time, the grooming itself became shorter and shorter,” Lameira said, “to the point that the groomer would now just have to touch its protruded lips with a slight suction movement on the other's skin as if it has just groomed the other.”

This remnant gesture may have become a new social ritual as humans evolved, becoming a comforting behavior between individuals. Since the “groomer’s final kiss” happened at the end of a bonding interaction, it may have taken on symbolic meaning that humans came to recognize as a kiss, especially in social or romantic contexts.

Interestingly, similar lip-to-lip contact has been observed in other primates, particularly during post-conflict situations. In great apes, mouth-to-mouth contact occurs mainly after conflict as a form of reconciliation. “These moments of snout-to-snout touch are coined ‘kissing’ as shorthand,” Lameira notes, “in large part due to the quick likeness of the behavior to one that human observers readily recognize for themselves.” Following a conflict, this mouth contact may serve as a gesture of comfort, helping to repair social bonds.

Besides reconciliation, Lameira points out that nonhuman primates sometimes display brief mouth contact during grooming sessions, typically to complete the task by removing an irritant from a companion’s fur. Such a final act could be similar to the affectionate kisses observed in humans today, symbolizing reassurance rather than strictly serving a functional purpose.

Human cultures have long ascribed meaning to kissing, embedding it with social, emotional, and even erotic significance. Historical records suggest kissing rituals existed in various forms as early as 4,500 years ago. In ancient Rome, different types of kisses carried specific social meanings.

The osculum, for instance, involved a cheek kiss symbolizing social or familial affection, while the basium, a kiss on the lips, signified closeness without romantic implications. Meanwhile, the savium was reserved for erotic desire between partners. Such cultural distinctions imply that kissing carried varying degrees of significance depending on the context, and social conventions regulated who could kiss, how, and when.

Today, these kissing etiquettes vary widely. In some parts of Europe, a greeting kiss involves a quick left-right cheek touch. However, kissing between men, for example, might be reserved for family or ceremonial occasions. Cultural norms continue to dictate kissing practices, yet the practice remains grounded in universal patterns of affection. This implies that kissing likely has a biological basis older than our societal customs.

Why has this behavior persisted when many hypotheses about its origin fall short? Unlike pre-chewing food for an infant, kissing involves a slight suction or pucker that doesn’t aid in feeding. Kissing doesn’t provide any nutritive value and isn’t limited to infants, leading some researchers to challenge theories linking kissing to nursing or feeding.

Other theories, such as the idea that kissing originated from sniffing a partner as a form of social inspection, don’t fully explain why lip contact and suction specifically became a part of the behavior. Lameira’s hypothesis, however, aligns more closely with observed primate social behaviors.

To further explore this theory, Lameira suggests observing the grooming behaviors of different primate populations with varying coat thicknesses. By comparing how grooming varies with fur density, researchers might find insights into how this behavior evolved in humans. If primates with denser coats exhibit longer grooming sessions, it might reinforce the idea that as humans lost their fur, the act of grooming grew shorter and eventually transformed into kissing.

Lameira’s theory not only connects kissing with our evolutionary past but also emphasizes the importance of considering our socio-ecological and cognitive context. As social animals, humans and other primates depend on rituals that reinforce social bonds. For humans, these social signals have diversified into complex customs like kissing, a behavior that has become intertwined with cultural and emotional significance.

Given its biological roots and cultural complexity, the evolution of kissing might forever remain speculative. Theories like Lameira’s provide intriguing insights, but the exact timeline of when kissing emerged in human history remains unknown. While mouth-to-mouth contact does not occur universally across human cultures, other primates like bonobos and chimpanzees also display similar behaviors, suggesting that human kissing could stem from an ancient form of bonding.

Despite its mysterious origins, kissing has remained a meaningful practice throughout human history. Whether expressed through a light kiss on the cheek or an intimate mouth-to-mouth gesture, kissing symbolizes a form of closeness unique to humans and some primates.

And while you may not consider the link between ancient grooming behaviors and modern kissing the next time you share a kiss, it’s fascinating to think of this act as a vestige of our primate ancestry—a symbol of comfort, bonding, and reassurance, adapted over thousands of years.

In Lameira’s words, “For future evolutionary insight into the evolution of human kissing, and other behaviors uniquely exhibited by our species, it will be important to retain in mind and ponder the influence of the broader socio-ecological, cognitive, and communicative context of human ancestors.”

This evolutionary perspective on kissing serves as a reminder of how complex and meaningful our social behaviors truly are, with roots stretching far back into our past.

Note: Materials provided above by The Brighter Side of News. Content may be edited for style and length.

Like these kind of feel good stories? Get The Brighter Side of News' newsletter.